Vancouver Criminal Law

OUR LOCATIONS:

Vancouver: 604 685 8889
Richmond: 604 370 3050
Surrey: 604 593 8580
Victoria: 250 384 0100
Nanaimo: 250 754 9558
Kelowna: 250 860 2766
Kamloops: 250 372 3448
Fort McMurray: 780 750 7588
Prince George: 250 564 8835

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2016 Acumen Law Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.

Call 24 Hrs

604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

Search
Locations
 

Blog

Vancouver Criminal Law Blog
Acumen Law Corporation > Blog (Page 37)

Grandpa’s punishment highlights gap in drunk-driving laws

Grandpa gets an IRP

The B.C. superintendent of motor vehicles says he was unable to correct the wrongful punishment of a pensioner for drunk driving, even though he was a passenger in a car driven by his stone-cold sober grandson. The man did not file an appeal under the provisions of the controversial legislation that came into effect in 2010. Drunk-driving laws: Vancouver lawyer Paul Doroshenko and other defence lawyers were flabbergasted by the high-handed behaviour. Police can demand “a driver” provide a breath sample on an approved screening device under the federal Criminal Code — but that law does not allow them to make such a demand...

Continue reading

IRP defences that don’t work

Defences that don't work

Speaking at a conference a few weeks ago we laid out 27 of the IRP defences that don't work which should work if the system were fair. Of course, when it comes to Immediate Roadside Prohibitions, fairness has nothing to do with it. Many people are guilty, a significant number are innocent and the review procedure is faulty such that the innocent can't be identified (see: Spencer). And of course, you're punished long before you get a chance to make your case in the hearing, which, as we have said before, is a faulty review process (see: Spencer). Our editorial...

Continue reading

Drivers face double standard with drug-related suspensions

Kyla Lee DUI Lawyer

B.C.'s Superintendent of Motor Vehicles is looking to change the province's laws so drivers allegedly impaired by drugs can appeal 24-hour roadside suspensions. Both alcohol and drug-related 24-hour suspensions are issued under different parts of Section 215 of the Motor Vehicle Act. While drivers allegedly impaired by alcohol have the right to a review, drivers suspended for drug use either have to convince the ticketing officer to reconsider or file a petition in B.C. Supreme Court for a judicial review. Vancouver lawyer Kyla Lee, who specializes in drinking-driving related cases, says the lack of a formal review process places an undue burden on...

Continue reading

How to beat a DUI in BC

How to beat a DUI in BC

In casual conversation one thing we're often asked is how to beat a DUI. It's a funny question because what we're really being asked is how to drink and drive without facing the law. We know all about the legal schemes to catch DUI drivers in BC, and surprising even to us is that we can predict fairly well where the roadblocks will be located on any given night. And as best as possible, we could actually tell you how to beat a DUI in BC if your plan was to set out to drink and drive. The thing is, as...

Continue reading

Tribunal with unsound methods

Tribunal with unsound methods

As we've explained before, and was clearly stated in the Spencer decision, the OSMV tribunal lacks many of the fact-finding features necessary to make reliable decisions when reviewing an IRP driving prohibition. The legislation prohibits cross examination of the officer. The OSMV tribunal made the decision, without anything in Motor Vehicle Act to back it up, to limit review hearings to 30 minutes. Lawyers are refused any request for disclosure beyond that which the Government wants to hand over. The evidence of the police is, almost without exception, accepted without question and the evidence of the applicant is often parsed...

Continue reading