Vancouver Criminal Law


Vancouver: 604 685 8889
Richmond: 604 370 3050
Surrey: 604 593 8580
Victoria: 250 384 0100
Nanaimo: 250 754 9558
Kelowna: 250 860 2766
Kamloops: 250 372 3448
Fort McMurray: 780 750 7588
Prince George: 250 564 8835



Copyright 2016 Acumen Law Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.

Call 24 Hrs

604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation





Vancouver Criminal Law Blog
Acumen Law Corporation > Blog (Page 40)

Hockey! and drunk driving

Hocket drinking driving IRPs and impaired driving

Many people and businesses are celebrating the end of the hockey lockout/strike. From taxi drivers, ticket resellers, restaurant and bar owners, hospitality industry workers, the people and the companies that sell advertising, the businesses that supply all of the sports bars and restaurants and stadiums with all of their stuff -- they're all happy, and in particular the breweries because in a matter of days, people will be out watching hockey games and spending their money to buy tickets, taxis, food and beer. Lots and lots of beer. Of course, a number of folks won't take taxis. It turns out hockey...

Continue reading

Clerical error and your IRP review decision

Clerical errors include the Inquisition

If you can recall the wording of your Immediate Roadside Prohibition review decision, and you remember the phrase "clerical error" or some such dismissive comment used by the OSMV tribunal to suggest that a police officer simply made a mistake when completing his or her evidence, you may want to pull that decision out and read it in light of the Modhgill decision. In Modhgill the calibration expiry date was so far down the road that you could not say that the ASD was being properly calibrated. The service expiry date may have been correct or it may have been inadvertently...

Continue reading

IRP Appeal Update

We hope for justice

As most of our readers know, the first version of the 90-day IRP scheme for blowing Fail on an ASD was found unconstitutional by the BC Supreme Court. Despite that, the Court gave no remedy to all of the people who received these unconstitutional driving prohibitions. There were lots of issues, and neither the Government nor the Petitioners were satisfied with the BC Supreme Court ruling. So both sides appealed the ruling, and now it's going to the BC Court of Appeal. The expectation was that the IRP appeal would be heard in February. Now it is scheduled to proceed in March...

Continue reading

The Missing Women’s Inquiry

Police failures

On December 17, 2012, the Honorable Mr. Wally Oppal released the long-awaited report in the Missing Women’s Inquiry. This Report came after months of testimony from police officers, Crown-Counsel prosecutors, sex trade workers and the families of missing and murdered women. Just shy of 1,500 pages, in six separate volumes, the Report into the Missing Women’s Inquiry is a significant document recording the findings of the inquiry. The findings are disturbing, as you might expect. In his report, Mr. Oppal makes sixty-two recommendations. These recommendations range in scope from the establishment of a compensation fund for children of missing or murdered women...

Continue reading

Tragic deaths

Tragic deaths

The news of the shooting in Connecticut should at the very least provide perspective for all of us when we think of our family, friends and the people we care for. In the last few days most of us have turned our minds to just how much we care about the people around us. It may be a natural human tendency to hope that something good that can come from a tragedy. In this case the loss and suffering are so great. There is nothing that can relieve the lifetime of pain for these families. We grieve along with them. Also...

Continue reading

Hit and Run

Hit and Run - escaping the consequences of an accident you need a lawyer

By virtue of the fact that we handle so many driving cases, we can get a sense right away if there has been a change in driving behaviour. When the Immediate Roadside Prohibition scheme came out we noticed an immediate increase in the number of hit and run cases from the increase in people contacting our office. It should not come as a surprise to anyone. This has been researched and the connection has been acknowledged in the academic literature. Simply put, the more draconian and unfair the DUI laws, the fewer the number of people who will remain at the...

Continue reading

Which law applies?

Which law applies for old IRP prohibitions on review

We explained the other day that people who disputed their IRP issued in November 2011 have been getting letters from the OSMV saying that they want them to have another hearing. In most cases the hearing was already conducted, but the letter says that the adjudicator no longer works there (not always true) or that there is some other reason that they need to re-conduct the hearing. Of course it's contrary to natural justice to unilaterally put the case over for a year, and it's yet more offensive that all of these people have had this hanging over their heads. And...

Continue reading

Another hearing for an old IRP

Letter from the OSMV about getting the interlock

We started receiving letters last week from the OSMV concerning clients we acted for to dispute their IRP in November 2011. There were three variations on the letter but the essence was the same for each: the OSMV wants to have another hearing for an old IRP. A year ago the BC Supreme Court found the IRP scheme as it was violated the Charter of Rights. Most people know this. We acted for a number of people in the weeks leading up to November 30, 2011, to conduct their IRP review hearing. In most of the cases, we conducted the hearing,...

Continue reading

Update: 60 days to get the Interlock letter

Get the interlock letter

At the end of September we started getting calls from people who had received a letter from the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles telling them they had 60 days to get the Interlock installed in their vehicle and enroll in the RDP program. None of these folks were our clients or former clients, so this was new to us. It turns out that many people who received a 90-day IRP for Fail in the weeks before November 30, 2011, were never compelled to get the Interlock or take the Responsible Driver Program. The reason, it seems, is that the OSMV was holding...

Continue reading

IRP Petition update – clients with the prohibition stayed

IRP Petition update

As we mentioned in yesterday's post, we received word from the Attorney General's office late yesterday that they're changing their position with respect to our IRP clients with the prohibition stayed. We have many clients for whom we filed Petitions in court to challenge their IRP decision under the first version of the scheme. For a number of clients, we also obtained court orders staying (suspending) the driving prohibition pending a resolution in the Sivia case. We did something smart in retrospect. Where possible we also advanced arguments in many of the Petitions concerning administrative law errors we identified in the OSMV...

Continue reading