Vancouver Criminal Law


Vancouver: 604 685 8889
Richmond: 604 370 3050
Surrey: 604 593 8580
Victoria: 250 384 0100
Nanaimo: 250 754 9558
Kelowna: 250 860 2766
Kamloops: 250 372 3448
Fort McMurray: 780 750 7588
Prince George: 250 564 8835



Copyright 2018 Acumen Law Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.

Call 24 Hrs

604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation





Vancouver Criminal Law Blog
Acumen Law Corporation > Blog (Page 68)

7-Day Extension Update

When the OSMV (Part of the Ministry of Solicitor General) stopped rendering decisions on all letters requesting an extension of the 7-day review period to file for an IRP review, we filed a Petition to get a mandamus order from Court forcing them to start rendering decisions. When the Attorney General's office contacted us to discuss the matter, we learned that the OSMV on their own initiative simply stopped rendering these decisions, denying all of the applicants their right to have their matter considered.  As far as the Attorney General's office was concerned, the OSMV needed to get back to...

Continue reading

ICBC Advice

Over the past few weeks we have received a number of calls from people seeking clarification about what they were told by ICBC or the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles. We have heard reports of people who have called ICBC or the OSMV and were informed that they can attend at ICBC and pick up their drivers licenses without installing the Interlock or taking the Responsible Drivers Program. When they actually get to ICBC, however, they find out that this is untrue and are asked to pay to register in these programs. The advice people are given is inappropriate. Agents...

Continue reading

Port Moody ASD Update:

Port Moody Update

A while back we broke the story that Approved Screening Devices (ASD) used by the Port Moody Police Department were not being calibrated properly. As a result of our having gone public with this information, the Port Moody Police announced that they had an external unit investigate their actions. They never acknowledged that there was a problem with their ASD calibration. We wanted to know more. So we made a Freedom of Information Request to the Port Moody Police asking for all the information they had about the steps they had taken to address the problem. We received an incomplete but...

Continue reading

Traffic Violations and Your Driving Record

Traffoc Violations and your driving record

Many people do not realize the impact that a traffic ticket can have on their driving record. A Novice or Learner driver, in particular, is at a great risk for having a license suspension with even one driving infraction. The Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles has the power to suspend the driver’s license of any person if it is of the opinion that the driving record is unsatisfactory and a prohibition is in the public interest. This broad power is to be used at the discretion of the Superintendent. This means that any time you receive a conviction for...

Continue reading

Refusal IRPs

Refusal IRP

Earlier this week we announced that the Sivia case has been appealed. One aspect of this appeal relates to the Court’s decision that IRPs for refusing or failing to comply with an ASD test are constitutional. In our view, they are not. Not even close. Even though the Sivia case is under appeal, the police are still issuing Immediate Roadside Prohibitions for refusal. We also have clients who have filed Petitions to the Court after their failure to blow IRPs were upheld on review. The Government is refusing to grant stays of driving prohibitions and other consequences for individuals who received refusal...

Continue reading

3, 7 and 30-day Immediate Driving Prohibitions for Warn

IRP for Warn

The most repugnant aspect of the IRP scheme in our view is the reliance on Approved Screening Devices for punishment. ASDs were never intended to be the basis of punishment. Firstly, the test is taken in violation of sections 10(a) and 10(b) of the Charter of Rights. Because of the Charter violations the courts have consistently concluded that the results cannot be used against an accused for punishment or to speak to the physical state of the accused. The results can only be used by an officer to form an opinion regarding whether to take further action. So there are limits...

Continue reading

Time is up

As we have explained before, many British Columbians are waiting for decisions on their request to extend the 7-day period to file to review their IRP. Until earlier this week there was a moratorium on rendering these decisions. Either the Government instructed the OSMV to stop rendering decisions or the OSMV took it upon themselves to stop rendering decisions. In any event, we believe that this was an effort to block people from accessing the Court to obtain justice. Some background: On November 30, 2011, the BC Supreme Court ruled that the law where you were issued a 90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition...

Continue reading

Some Big News re: IRPs

Big News re IRPs

In case you missed the newscast on CTV this evening, we can now confirm that the lead case in the Immediate Roadside Prohibition judicial review decisions handed down November 30, 2011 and December 23, 2011, (i.e. Sivia v. The Superintendent) is now under appeal. The documents were filed January 20, 2012. The appeal deals with the finding concerning alleged refusal cases. We expect that it will be widened to cover other matters as further investigation and legal research is conducted. There is a significant amount of material that was not available to the Court when the original petition was conducted. It...

Continue reading

OSMV Under Scrutiny

OSMV - Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

The BC Supreme Court seems to be taking an increasingly dim view of the decision making process at the OSMV. Just last Thursday the Court terminated a 1-year driving prohibition because "[i]t was  arbitrary, and completely unreasonable to issue a prohibition on the level of proof offered by the officer." If you received an IRP and conducted a review, no doubt you have formed your own opinion of the process. There is little more to be added to what the Court already stated in Spencer and Wang, which is the decision from January 24, 2012. Here are some interesting comments from the...

Continue reading

Personal Financial Decisions

Each person who receives an Immediate Roadside Prohibition suffers the consequences in their own way. For some it is not too great an inconvenience. Some wealthy people simply go on a three month vacation. Others hire a driver. But for normal people, who often drive as part of their work, the consequences are dire. A significant number of British Columbians are living paycheque to paycheque, struggling to make the mortgage payments, keep food on the table and cover everyday expenses. For these people an IRP is a devastating blow. If you end up serving the entire IRP, it could mean the...

Continue reading