Vancouver Criminal Law


Vancouver: 604 685 8889
Richmond: 604 370 3050
Surrey: 604 593 8580
Victoria: 250 384 0100
Kelowna: 250 860 2766
Fort McMurray: 780 750 7588



Copyright 2016 Acumen Law Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.

Call 24 Hrs

604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation





Vancouver Criminal Law Blog
Acumen Law Corporation > Blog (Page 8)

Province cancels dozens of IRPs due to RCMP mistakes

Province cancels IRPs

The provincial government has quietly cancelled over 70 roadside suspensions after learning RCMP had been using incorrect gas to calibrate their breathalyzers. It’s policy that they use certified gas and they were not.[pullquote]The government’s been doing everything to keep this in the can,” he tells us. [/pullquote] These details were obtained through a Freedom of Information request. It’s 70 pages of correspondence between staff with the Ministry of Justice and the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, discussing how they will tell the people affected and what the minister should say to the media if asked. It includes a copy of the letter sent to 39 drivers...

Continue reading

Not what you wanted – SCC rules on IRPs

Not what you wanted

The decision came down early this morning and within minutes it hit the news. The bottom line is that nothing changes for people who were issued an IRP between June 15, 2012 and today. The court has given the rubber stamp to the status quo. SCC rules on IRPs The first version of the IRP scheme is still unconstitutional. The decision confirmed that finding, originally held by the BC Supreme Court and BC Court of Appeal. No change there. The first version of the IRP scheme was unconstitutional, but that's not the version in effect today. The lawyers for the drivers had hoped...

Continue reading

General to specific: defective breathalyzer update

General to the specific

In the next few hours we'll get a decision from the Supreme Court of Canada in Goodwin/Sivia and Wilson. It's going to be an interesting day. Defective breathalyzer update In the meantime, we need to tell you about the decision we received Thursday in the judicial reviews we did for two clients who blew into breathalyzers in the defective range. These are the cases we advanced because of the systematic defects Paul identified in a certain range of ASDs purchased in the summer of 2010. Our argument in court was that the adjudicator was wrong in concluding that Paul’s affidavit (which many of...

Continue reading

Big IRP shakeout

Big IRP Shakeout

This week is the big IRP shakeout. Early Friday morning the Supreme Court of Canada will issue the decisions in Sivia (Goodwin) v. the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and Wilson v. the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles. Both cases arise from the major challenges to the Immediate Roadside Prohibition law which first came into effect on September 20, 2010.[pullquote]The Supreme Court of Canada usually only permits appeals to be heard if they have a plan on rendering a decision that has some significant legal impact.[/pullquote] Timing of the appeals We argued Wilson on May 19, 2015 right before the arguments in the Sivia...

Continue reading

The steps of a DUI police investigation

In this video I will tell you about the steps of a DUI police investigation. There have been drunk driving laws for just over 100 years, so shortly after the car was invented. And before the invention of the car, there were traffic police in major cities dealing with horses and buggies. So enforcement of drunk driving laws is nothing new. [pullquote]The fact of an accident may do little for the police in building their case.[/pullquote] The steps of a DUI police investigation haven't changed that much over the decades. It all starts with observations of driving. The police may be looking for...

Continue reading

Tactical IRP misinformation


When we received the information that led to our Red Alert blog post, we knew that something fishy was happening over at RoadSafetyBC. Immediately, we made a request pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act for copies of all internal correspondence, memorandums, and other documents created in relation to their sudden policy change.[pullquote]In this case the BC Government was using this sort of reasoning to make their policy decisions. If it wasn't so pathetic and damaging it would be funny.[/pullquote] You may remember that the Red Alert was issued in December, 2014. We received the records on...

Continue reading

Dissecting a DUI police investigation – the basics

Dissecting police DUI investigations from Paul Doroshenko: My name is Paul Doroshenko and I'm an IRP lawyer. What that means is that I defend the drunk driving cases that are common in BC. I've defended DUI and impaired driving cases for over 15 years. Today I will tell you a little bit about dissecting police investigations in a drink drive case. [pullquote]In the majority of the drinking driving cases, the police officer is the witness to the driving, the witness to the police stop, the witness to the...

Continue reading

Access to justice?

Access to justice is a lie

The BC Government often claims that it's trying to facilitate "access to justice." What started off as a noble cause has become Orwellian doublespeak for impeding access to justice. We see it on a daily basis because we deal with criminal cases in criminal court all of the time.[pullquote]What we see is governments trying to be unfair, i.e. trying to create unfairness and an unfair system for their advantage.[/pullquote] It's important to remember that, although the government is your friend when it comes to protecting you from bad guys, they are motivated to strip you of your rights in the quest for...

Continue reading

What happens at the IRP hearing

What happens at the IRP hearing from Paul Doroshenko on Vimeo. WATCH: My name is Paul Doroshenko and I'm a lawyer with Acumen Law Corporation. We are the lawyers for people from all around BC when it comes to disputing Immediate Roadside Prohibitions. We succeed in more IRP review hearings than any other BC law firm month after month, so you can have some confidence that we know what we're talking about.[pullquote]It's common that we end up using the entire 30 minute period making submissions to ensure that all of our arguments have been covered.[/pullquote] When it comes to IRP hearings, in...

Continue reading