604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation

604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation

Read about our past cases

 

We believe that actions speak louder than words. While we’re committed to providing exceptional legal services, we know that results matter. That’s why we don’t just talk about our values—we demonstrate them through our case results and the successful outcomes we’ve achieved for our clients. The experiences of those we’ve represented speak for themselves.

But don’t just take our word for it. We invite you to explore our case results and see the difference our legal team has made.

Case Results

Frequently Asked Questions

Are these actual results from this firm's cases?

Yes. Every case listed in our results section reflects a file handled by one of our lawyers in a British Columbia court or administrative tribunal. Identifying details of clients and, where applicable, complainants have been removed for privacy. Where a case result is particularly novel or turned on an unusual legal argument, we have described the argument without identifying the file.

Does a past result guarantee a similar outcome in my case?

No. Each criminal case depends on its specific facts, the strength of the Crown’s evidence, the client’s personal circumstances, and the legal arguments that are genuinely available. Results shown are examples of what we have achieved in cases we found defensible. They are not a prediction of what will happen in yours. The Law Society of BC’s rules on advertising specifically caution against implying guaranteed results, and we do not.

Why do some of the case results say 'charge withdrawn' while others say 'acquittal'?

These are legally different outcomes. A ‘withdrawal’ or ‘stay of proceedings’ happens when the Crown decides not to proceed with the charge, often after negotiation, alternative measures, or a defence submission that persuades the Crown the file is not suitable for prosecution. An ‘acquittal’ happens after a trial, where the court finds the Crown has not proven the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. Both outcomes result in no conviction, but the paths to get there are different.

What does 'excluded under s. 24(2)' mean in these results?

Section 24(2) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms allows a court to exclude evidence obtained through a Charter breach. This is typically an unlawful search, arbitrary detention, or breach of the right to counsel. The court can exclude the evidence where the defendant proves that admitting the evidence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute. When the main piece of Crown evidence (the drugs, the gun, the statement, the breath sample) is excluded, the Crown often has no case left. Section 24(2) exclusions are a recurring theme in our case results because Charter litigation is a core part of our defence practice.

I was told my case is 'just impaired' or 'just a small fraud' - is it worth fighting?

Usually yes. Every imparted driving conviction leaves a criminal record. Other charges often carry a criminal record as well. A conviction can create problems with U.S. travel, insurance, and in many professions. Every conviction has collateral consequences, such as deportation for non-citizens. Before concluding a case is not worth defending, have a lawyer review the disclosure for Charter issues and evidentiary weaknesses. Many of our best results have come from files that clients initially described as ‘open and shut.’

.

Contact Us Now
free consultation

Friendly Lawyers,
Professional Service

Call us at 604-685-8889 for a free consultation and
learn how we can successfully help you.

Scroll to Top
CALL US NOW