Yes, we noticed it and one of our readers did too. If you look at the image of the invoice from our blog posting on June 7, 2012, you will see a unit described as having a serial number 1014890. The serial number listed is an error — the actual unit was 101489 or 101490 (or both). But that doesn’t matter so much. What matters is the service work done to this unit and the date of the invoice.
When they were working on the unit the person performing the service discovered that it had not been reprogrammed to register a Warn at .06 rather than .05%. The notation is W/F levels 60/100. The invoice records the units having been shipped for service from Vancouver on March 31, 2011.
Yes. That is over three months after the police in BC guaranteed everyone that all of the units had been reprogrammed to indicate Warn at .06.
When the service work was performed on this unit the service technician discovered that the unit had not been reprogrammed.
We have found this on so many invoices that we have lost track of the number and we’ve stopped counting. To us the point is that the police lied. They said that all of the units had been reprogrammed, yet clearly many had not been. And the consequences for BC drivers were wrongfully issued driving prohibitions.