Call 24 Hrs

604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation

Call 24 Hrs

604 685 8889

Call Us For Free Consultation

Our Videos

Immigration Consequences & Criminal Convictions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Immigration Consequences & Criminal Convictions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses immigration consequences for criminal convictions and how they intersect with Canada’s criminal and immigration laws. Key Points Discussed:The Case of Akim Mvana:Akim Mvana, a citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, was convicted of summary offenses in Canada. Despite the offenses being prosecuted summarily, the Immigration and […]

Immigration Consequences & Criminal Convictions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Racketeering & Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Racketeering & Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines an important extradition case involving Peter Nygård, raising critical questions about how Canadian law applies comparative criminal analysis in extradition decisions. Key Points Discussed: Why This Case Matters: Missed Opportunity by the Supreme Court: The Court could have provided guidance on: A definitive ruling would have protected

Racketeering & Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!” Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses a critical extradition case that raises questions about the interpretation of cruel and unusual punishment under Canadian law. Key Points Discussed:In extradition proceedings, Canadian law prohibits extraditing an individual to face a

Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Stays of Administrative Proceedings: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Stays of Administrative Proceedings: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!” Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses an important case about stays of administrative proceedings under appeal, highlighting the broader implications for access to justice and judicial efficiency. Key Points Discussed:A man involved in a disciplinary dispute with the

Stays of Administrative Proceedings: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Surveillance Cameras: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Surveillance Cameras: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses Duc Tung Hoang v. His Majesty the King, a case that raises critical questions about camera surveillance and its implications for privacy under Canadian law. Key Points Discussed:Police used a pole-mounted surveillance camera, positioned 15–20 feet high, to monitor Mr. Hoang’s residence without a warrant.The camera captured

Surveillance Cameras: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Product Liability & Government Standards: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Product Liability & Government Standards: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!” In today’s episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines a tragic bus crash case that raises critical issues about product liability, government safety standards, and negligence. Key Points Discussed:The Case: A fatal bus crash on a snowy Christmas Eve

Product Liability & Government Standards: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Lay Opinions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Lay Opinions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!” In today’s episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines a manslaughter case involving Mr. Toth, which raises crucial questions about lay opinions, social media’s influence, and evidentiary standards in court. Key Points Discussed:The Case: Mr. Toth was charged with

Lay Opinions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Delay to Trial & Judicial Unavailability: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Delay to Trial & Judicial Unavailability: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to another episode of Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation explores the case of Brandon McNeil, highlighting critical issues around trial delays and judicial discretion under Jordan principles. Key Points Discussed: Trial Delay Due to Illness: After Mr.

Delay to Trial & Judicial Unavailability: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Circumstantial Evidence & Sexual Assault: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Circumstantial Evidence & Sexual Assault: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!” In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses a crucial case involving circumstantial evidence in a sexual assault trial, highlighting issues surrounding consent and the evidentiary standards for intoxication. Key Points Discussed: Circumstantial Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases:

Circumstantial Evidence & Sexual Assault: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Liability in Auto Accidents: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Liability in Auto Accidents: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!” In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses a significant case involving liability in auto accidents that raises critical questions about ownership and consent. Key Points Discussed: The Accident: The case revolves around an accident that occurred in

Liability in Auto Accidents: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Lawyer’s Charter Rights: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Lawyer’s Charter Rights: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Acumen Law Corporation lawyer Kyla Lee gives her take on a made-in-Canada court case each week and discusses why these cases should have been heard by Canada’s highest court: the Supreme Court of Canada. In today’s episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses the unique and fascinating case of Sharon Fox, a lawyer charged

Lawyer’s Charter Rights: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Continue Reading »

Scroll to Top
CALL US NOW